What You Need to Know About Mt. Gox and the Bitcoin Software Flaw

What You Need to Know About Mt. Gox and the Bitcoin Software Flaw

Here’s what a terrible week looks like in the world of Bitcoin: Two of the most trafficked Bitcoin exchanges, Mt. Gox and Bitstamp, temporarily halt trading and suspend bitcoin withdrawals in the midst of a distributed denial of service attack (DDoS). On exchanges that are still open for business, the value of the currency takes a brutal, sudden hit and then continues to tumble. Bitcoin users notice strange errors in their wallet balances after making routine transactions. Rumor spreads that the Bitcoin protocol is critically flawed. And where rumor is lacking, conspiracy theories abound.

All this, and it’s barely Thursday.

Some of it is true. Some of it is half true. Some of it is completely false. Here is what’s really going on.

Mt. Gox, which until recently was the most trafficked of the Bitcoin exchanges, is at the center of this mess. Whether they actually caused it is a separate question and still up for debate. Either way, they’ve been in the Bitcoin doghouse for at least a year now, during which time they have been reliably generating bad Bitcoin press. Many traders who frequent the online exchange choose to leave some of their money (both bitcoin and fiat) in an account set up by the company. Keeping the money on site allows clients to do quick trades, but people are beginning to wonder whether Mt. Gox can be trusted to be responsible with the funds they have.

Last May,confidence was shaken by the news that the Department of Homeland Security had seized the Dwolla e-payments account of Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpeles and accused him of operating without the proper license. After the loss of this currency conduit, customers began reporting long delays withdrawing dollars from their Mt. Gox accounts. Poor communication fomented a deep mistrust in the exchange and people began to wonder whether Mt. Gox might have squandered its clients’ money. And now, as of last Friday, Mt. Gox customers can’t even withdraw bitcoins.

In a statement on its website, Mt. Gox claimed that it had identified a serious flaw in the Bitcoin protocol, one that behooved it to cease transactions until developers could find a solution. Conspiracy theories immediately followed. Several people implored Mt. Gox to somehow verify the solvency of their exchange. (One guy even staked out the office in Japan to confront Karpeles himself.) But the mob lowered its pitchforks after core Bitcoin developers announced that the flaw Mt. Gox outlined does indeed exist. It’s called transaction malleability, and according to Bitcoin developers, it does need to be fixed.

“Generally, malleability is a design flaw in Bitcoin, albeit a very subtle one. So we can forgive Satoshi for overlooking it,” says Mike Hearn, a developer who works on the Bitocin protocol. (Satoshi Nakamoto is the pseudonym for the inventor of the Bitcoin protocol.)

In order to understand transaction malleability, you need to know that the balances of all Bitcoin addresses are maintained on a public ledger and that the changes made to this ledger are what constitute the transfer of funds.

When a transaction is broadcast to the network, it is relayed with a digital fingerprint that identifies it. Bitcoin miners then scoop it up, verify it, and send it on to the rest of the network for confirmation. Once the transaction has been confirmed, there is no way for that same person to spend those same bitcoins because they are being checked against the public ledger.

The malleability feature allows a person to intervene, right after the transaction request has been sent, modify the fingerprint and create a duplicate transaction. So, now you have two unconfirmed transactions flying around the network. They are both for the exact same payment, but they have different fingerprints and only one of them can be added to the public ledger. “The first one that is confirmed will be accounted for in the blockchain and will become the definitive record,” says Andreas Antonopoulos, the chief security officer for the Blockchain.info Bitcoin wallet. “The other will be dropped as a double spend attempt.”

It’s when the mutated version gets added that we start to have problems. It turns out that when Mt. Gox needs to verify that a transaction has gone through, it scans the public ledger for confirmations on the fingerprint that the transaction generated. If its software doesn’t see it, it assumes that the payment was not successfully sent. There are other, more reliable ways to set up the accounting, but from the little explanation Mt. Gox has given, this seems to be how its running its operation.

Using transaction malleability, it seems that some Mt. Gox customers were able to pull off a version of refund fraud, says Antonopoulos. Mt. Gox is claiming that some customers requested a bitcoin transaction and were able to quickly change the fingerprint on the transaction, making it looks like it hadn’t gone through. When they returned to Mt. Gox to complain, the exchange would agree to send payment again.

But it’s not just a headache for the exchanges. Malleability can also cause problems for people who conduct multiple Bitcoin transactions in rapid succession, causing some transactions to be voided and wallet balances to get out of sync with what’s reflected in the network. In essence, however, this is an accounting problem. It is not possible to use this flaw to steal or misdirect Bitcoins that you do not own.

“What these are are phantom transactions that don’t effect the balance but can fool your wallet into thinking that it has less than it has—which is scary but harmless,” says Antonopoulos.

If you are using Bitcoin right now, it’s quite possible that this will effect you. Shortly after Mt. Gox shined a spotlight on the problem, someone rushed to capitalize on it. The whole network is now experiencing a massive DDoS attack from a collection of rogue nodes that are working to change transaction fingerprints.

Every wallet will deal with this differently. Antonopoulos’s Blockchain.info wallet (which Apple just yanked from the iOS app store) interprets the event as a double spend attempt and alerts users accordingly. But, in all cases, the effects can be mitigated by simply waiting ten minutes between each payment.

Hearn says that coming up with a complete fix is a long-term goal. In the meantime, exchanges will have to change their implementation to account for mutated transactions—something which some exchanges already do. Antonopoulos says he expects Bitstamp to be up and running by next week.

It will be very interesting to see what happens when Mt. Gox re-opens. With all of the mischief they’ve created and ill-will they’ve inspired, a lot of people are going to be looking to get out as soon as they have the chance, and I expect them to do everything they can to avoid a bank run.

“They have to handle their return path very carefully,” says Antonopoulos. “They’ve burnt the credibility that would give them enough breathing room to do it right.”

But when it comes to the Bitcoin protocol and the currency itself, Antonopoulos is not worried at all. In fact, he says, “attacks make it more resilient.”

Hackers hit Tesco as over 2,200 accounts compromised

Hackers hit Tesco as over 2,200 accounts compromised

Tesco, an international supermarket chain, has been forced to deactivate online customer accounts after hackers took aim at its systems.
The company confirmed to The Guardian on Friday that over 2,200 of its accounts were compromised. Interestingly, it’s believed that the hackers didn’t actually break into its systems, but instead used data collected from other hacks to see if they could get any hits. The affected accounts used the same username and password combination as those in previous hacks, allowing the hackers to break in.
Rather than snoop around, however, the hackers posted the compromised accounts online, giving both personal details and usernames and passwords.
The Tesco hacks comes just a couple of months after a massive data breach at Target left up to 110 million people with personal information open to hackers. Target is still investigating that breach and has closed down the gaps that allowed the hackers in. Still, it’s possible that the data leaked to the Web by those hackers is being used in a fashion similar to the way Tesco data was stolen.
According to Tesco, it has contacted the affected customers. The company has not said when the online accounts will be reactivated.

Kickstarter hacked, user data stolen

Kickstarter hacked, user data stolen

Hackers hit crowd-funding site Kickstarter and made off with user information, the site said Saturday.
Though no credit card info was taken, the site said, attackers made off with usernames, e-mail addresses, mailing addresses, phone numbers, and encrypted passwords.
“Actual passwords were not revealed, however it is possible for a malicious person with enough computing power to guess and crack an encrypted password, particularly a weak or obvious one,” the site said in a blog post, adding that “as a precaution, we strongly recommend that you create a new password for your Kickstarter account, and other accounts where you use this password.”
The site said law enforcement told Kickstarter of the breach on Wednesday night and that the company “immediately closed the security breach and began strengthening security measures throughout the Kickstarter system.” The site also said “no credit card data of any kind was accessed by hackers” and that “there is no evidence of unauthorized activity of any kind on all but two Kickstarter user accounts.”
You can read additional information about resetting a password here. We’ve contacted Kickstarter for more info on the attacks and will update this post when we hear back.

HTC performs a u-turn, says ‘actively exploring’ Android 4.4 KitKat update for One X

HTC performs a u-turn, says 'actively exploring' Android 4.4 KitKat update for One X

HTC on Friday hosted an AMAA (Ask Me Almost Anything) on Reddit with its North America product management team. While the team did not answer questions of upcoming products and service issues, it did shed light on the software update process for some of its older phones.
We have seen that HTC hasn’t had the best track record when it comes to updating flagship devices in a timely manner and during the Q&A session, the company admitted as much and made a promise to fasten its device update process.

HTC’s product management said on Reddit, “We don’t have a perfect track record regarding updates along with almost every phone manufacturer, but we’re dedicated to bring more transparency to the process and doing our best to deliver updates as quickly as we can.”

The company also said it was a lack of support from NVIDIA that caused them to drop support for future updates for HTC One X and HTC One X+ which runs on the NVIDIA Tegra 3 chipset.

But now it appears that the company has taken a U-turn as during the AMAA session, the company’s product manager confirmed that HTC is “actively exploring” the possibility of Android 4.4 KitKat for the HTC One X.

HTC further announced that it will support all future flagship devices with major updates for two years after their release.

“Today we are making a commitment to support all new North America flagship devices going forward with all major Android updates for 2 years after their release date,” HTC’s team added.

If you are a HTC 8X user, there’s good news for you as well. HTC confirmed that the company is working with Microsoft to provide the Windows Phone 8.1 update to the smartphone later this year.

HTC has been talking about updates quite a bit recently, having recently published a complicated infographic and software updates page that details how the company updates the software on their phones. The page share timeline and other details about forthcoming software updates.

Samsung Galaxy Grand 2 review

Samsung Galaxy Grand 2 review

Samsung was one of the first companies to really run with the idea of big-screen phones. Others had tried before and failed, but Samsung managed to turn its original Galaxy Note into a massive success. Big screens have since percolated down to the more budget-oriented phones, but these usually have lower resolutions and weaker processors, negating many of the advantages phones that size. Samsung’s own Galaxy Grand was meant to appeal to people who wanted a big screen just for the sake of having a big screen, without paying flagship-level prices.

The original Galaxy Note had a 5.3-inch 800×1280-pixel screen, which was pretty cutting-edge in 2011. Today, you can get full-HD 1080×1920-pixel screens in phones that cost a quarter of what Samsung’s late-2011 flagship did at the time of its launch. The company’s latest budget big-screen offering, the 5.25-inch Galaxy Grand 2, actually matches the original Note in terms of screen size and resolution. It’s only 0.05 inches smaller, and runs at the 16:9 resolution of 720×1280 which is just as tall but a little bit narrower.

Samsung_galaxy_grand2_booting_ndtv.jpg
In fact, the Galaxy Grand 2 is the perfect example of how far technology has progressed in the past few years. You’re getting specifications that match or exceed a flagship that’s just a few years old at roughly half its price.

But that fact alone doesn’t make the Galaxy Grand 2 a winner. The competitive landscape is full of oversized phones from budget as well as premium multinational brands in the same price range. Some of them offer full-HD screens while others offer octa-core processors. Our detailed analysis of the Galaxy Grand 2’s features, specifications and performance will determine whether or not it’s good enough to beat them.

Look and Feel
At first glance, the Galaxy Grand 2 is rather striking. Its front face is totally consistent with the rest of Samsung’s lineup; a look that hasn’t changed much in years. Compared to its predecessor, the Grand 2 is a little more squared off, but is otherwise pretty much the same. There’s a shiny chrome-finished ring around its edges, with a similarly shiny earpiece and Samsung and Duos logos above the screen. There’s even a matching ring around the home button, just for good measure. The glass front panel is slightly sunken, which makes the metallic elements seem to rise through and around it. Beneath the glass is a white plastic layer with a very subtle honeycomb pattern for texture. It’s the sort of thing you only notice if you look at the phone very closely.

Samsung_galaxy_grand2_flat_ndtv.jpg
Flanking the slightly raised Home button are the usual Back and Menu buttons, but these are of the capacitive touch variety. Their icons light up when you’re using the phone, but are otherwise completely hidden. You can tap them whether or not they’re lit up, and at least they’re in their standard positions.

Around the back, we can see the faux-leather texture that has become a signature Samsung flourish, complete with fake stitching around the edges. This design was first seen in the Galaxy Note 3 and has recently popped up again on the Galaxy S4 and S4 Mini black editions. Apple might have moved away from mimicking real-world textures and materials, but Samsung seems to be jumping on this trend whole-heartedly. It does give the phone a good grip, but we personally don’t like it at all, and feel it makes the phone look a lot cheaper from the back than it does from the front.

Samsung_galaxy_grand2_rear_ndtv.jpg
Some of these things feel like contradictions in the Galaxy Grand 2’s design. The front and back look nothing alike, and the subtle textures and buttons are offset by the garish silver logos. Samsung clearly doesn’t believe that people who buy devices in this price range might appreciate understated elegance, and it seems as though this phone is trying a bit too hard to stand out from the crowd.

You’ll find the standard power and volume buttons on the right and left edges of the phone, but no dedicated camera button. There’s a headset jack on the top and a Micro-USB port for charging on the bottom.

Samsung_galaxy_grand2_sides_ndtv.jpg
The plastic back peels off quite easily, allowing you to access the battery and card slots. The battery is removable and fairly compact, and you’ll need to take it out before you can get to the SIM card slots. The microSD slot is positioned oddly on top of the primary SIM slot and it takes a little fiddling to get the card seated correctly. Both SIM card slots are designed for Micro-SIMs but a Nano-SIM can slide into the second one without any trouble and will stay securely enough for everyday use. Whether this is a deliberate design touch or not, we wish more phones would allow it.

Samsung_galaxy_grand2_slots_ndtv.jpg
The Galaxy Grand 2 isn’t so bulky or heavy that it can’t be used in one hand, but typing, for example, is far more comfortable with two hands.

Features and specifications

The Galaxy Grand 2 doesn’t have “Duos” attached to its name like the company’s dual-SIM offerings tend to, but it does support two GSM SIM cards in dual-standby rather than dual-active mode.

The device is powered by a quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 system-on-a-chip (SoC) running at 1.2 GHz. This is a mid-range quad-core offering, but it should at least be more powerful than similar processors from Mediatek and Broadcom that are more commonly found in phones at this price point.

There’s 1.5GB of RAM, which should be more than enough for smooth multitasking. Samsung has been a little stingy with only 8GB of internal storage space, though you can add up to 64GB more using a microSD card. Both SIM cards use the GSM standard and 3G speeds of up to 21Mbps are supported. Dual-band Wi-Fi n and Bluetooth 4.0 LE are standard, as are the acceleration, magnetic, proximity, rotation and orientation sensors.

Samsung_galaxy_grand2_frontbottom_ndtv.jpg
The screen is an ordinary LCD, not the more expensive AMOLED type found on Samsung’s higher-end products. 720×1280 is a marked improvement over the original Galaxy Grand’s 480×800, and we had no problem with the crispness of text and icons on screen. However, we’ve been spoilt by the full-HD screens on some of today’s competing budget phones, and Samsung’s large, colourful and widely spaced home screens and main menu only make it more obvious that this isn’t a full-HD panel we’re dealing with.

Software
Thankfully, the Galaxy Grand 2 runs Android 4.3 rather than the older versions that seem to be predominant on new phones even today. The bigger story though is Samsung’s TouchWiz UI, which is so extensive that there’s almost no visual similarity to stock Android anywhere.

It starts right from the lock screen. Notifications of unread calls and messages are front and centre, and all status bar icons are visible. You’ll see a burst of light and an animated lens flare towards the bottom, indicating which way you should swipe to unlock. As you swipe, the flare follows your finger. It’s a nice touch, though somewhat unnecessary.

Samsung_Galaxy_Grand2_home_ndtv.jpg
Of course, Samsung has customised the home screens as well. The lower quarter with shortcuts stays constant, while the rest of the space is used by five scrollable panels. The main panel has a large weather widget, Google search box, and a row of shortcuts. Three of the other screens are dominated by one large widget each: Flipboard, Story Album and Samsung Hub. The fifth and final panel is blank, and this is where shortcuts to apps you install will start appearing automatically. You can drag a finger along the indicator below to quickly flip between panels.

Swiping upwards from the bottom brings up My Magazine, a grid of news articles from various sources around the Web, laid out in large photo-heavy tiles. We must say this looks a lot like HTC’s Buzzfeed feature. You can adjust the categories of articles that appear, though it doesn’t seem like you can tweak the specific websites that articles are sourced from. You can also add your own social feeds and include photos and videos that are stored on your phone. You can also decide whether your text messages and emails appear as tiles mixed in with articles and social updates.

My Magazine seems a bit redundant since Flipboard is already available on one of the home screens. We’ve been hearing talk of a redesigned TouchWiz home screen for a long time now, and maybe this is a taste of what’s to come. For now though, it’s something that we’d in all likelihood forget about completely.

Samsung_Galaxy_Grand2_features_ndtv.jpg
As any Samsung user will know, there are more customised touches to be discovered at every turn. The notification shade has a row of toggle buttons for things like Wi-Fi, GPS, Bluetooth and Power Saving, along with a brightness slider right there, and playback controls if music is playing. The task manager view (brought up by long-pressing the Home button) lets you kill all apps with one tap, launch Google Now, and check out detailed resource usage statistics.

The default keyboard makes good use of screen real estate by adding a row for numbers. It would have been nice to be able to use the Shift key to add symbols quickly, but that isn’t possible. There’s a smart autocorrect feature that learns your habits, and a Swype clone for gesture-based typing.

Even the main menu is totally Samsung’s creation. App icons have of course been tweaked, and apps and widgets are clearly separated into their own distinct categories. A pinch gesture shows you all available pages as thumbnails, and you can drag to scroll quickly here too. Animation is simple, and we can’t find any reason to fault Samsung for changing things around.

Samsung_Galaxy_Grand2_settings_ndtv.jpg
The Galaxy Grand series might not support the S-Pen stylus that gives its Galaxy Note series more utility, but there is one feature that’s common to all of Samsung’s bigger phones: Multi Window lets you split the screen and run two apps simultaneously. It doesn’t work with all apps and it is a bit fiddly, but it can be extremely convenient. You can’t simply grab any full-screen app and make it run in a smaller space. You can save combinations of apps and launch them simultaneously. When the feature is enabled, a long-press on the Back button shows or hides the tray that lets you select apps for each slot.

S-voice is Samsung’s answer to Siri, and it’s accessed by double-tapping the Home button). From there, you can either tap the button on screen or say “Hi Galaxy” to make it start listening for voice commands. There’s a pretty extensive list of things you can do, which includes making calls, sending text messages, settings alarms and reminders, having the news read out, adding calendar events, posting to Twitter, launching apps, searching the Web and controlling phone settings such as Wi-Fi and Bluetooth.

Samsung_Galaxy_Grand2_multi_ndtv.jpg
You can ask S-Voice a simple question, and it will Google the entire phrase if it can’t decide how to process it as a command. This takes a little time, but accuracy is quite good. Even the voice Samsung uses to read responses is not too artificial. S-Voice requires a data connection, and will simply refuse to accept input if both Wi-Fi and cellular data are unavailable, even for simple commands such as toggling phone controls.

The Settings app also has plenty of Samsung tweaks. The whole thing is sorted into four categories: Connections, Device, Controls, and General. Blocking Mode only allows calls and messages from known people, so you aren’t disturbed by spam but can still receive important notifications. Easy Mode is a simplified interface suitable for technophobes and first-time users. There’s also a SIM card manager that lets you set default actions, and Voice controls that let you handle calls, trigger the camera, and control basic phone functions with your voice. Hands-free mode is suitable for drivers who don’t want their attention to leave the road, and One-handed operation contains a number of options that make it easier to use apps, handle calls and type with a single hand.

Samsung_Galaxy_Grand2_hub_ndtv.jpg
Samsung hasn’t been shy about promoting its own apps either. The company might have recently agreed to cooperate more with Google when it comes to a unified Android ecosystem, but the Galaxy Grand 2 has a boatload of Samsung’s own apps on display, while Google’s bundled ones are consigned to a folder right on the bottom of the main menu.

The Galaxy Grand 2’s house-branded Music and Video apps aren’t bad, but they duplicate some of the functionality of the originals, which might confuse some people. We ran into odd issues such as our MP4 files’ audio codecs not being recognised (though they work perfectly fine in other apps). Our larger HD videos also didn’t play, though FLAC audio did just fine.

Samsung also has its own app store, called Samsung Apps, which seems to have many well-known names, but also plenty of ripoffs and spam. Alongside that, there’s Samsung Hub, which offers videos, books, games and learning material. You can “install” each of these, which then live as their own sections within the Hub and within the respective Samsung apps.

Samsung_galaxy_grand2_side_ndtv.jpg
We took a look through them and found quite a few major titles including recent Bollywood releases. Disney’s Brave, for example, was available to buy for Rs. 510 or rent for Rs. 75 in standard definition, while HD (720p) versions of the same titles cost Rs. 680 and 100 to buy or rent respectively. 2012’s Barfi costs as little as Rs. 25 and 50 to stream in SD and HD, but purchasing it will cost Rs. 610 in either resolution. The more recent Iron Man 3 was only available for purchase, at Rs. 610 or Rs. 680 for SD and HD respectively. There’s also a “free zone” with a handful of completely unknown (and completely unappealing) titles.

You’re looking at download sizes of 1.2GB for the lower quality and 2.5GB for the higher quality. Trailers are available to stream, and you can stream videos to a network-connected Samsung TV or any DLNA media receiver at home via Wi-Fi.

The Learning Hub offers a variety of books and videos, both free and paid. The material includes everything from TED talks to recipe books, nursery rhymes and foreign language tutorials. Some of the categories are quite bare, but plenty of Indian languages are represented. You might be able to find something of value here, but it’s mostly quite messy and some of the titles look rather crudely produced.

Camera
Of course, Samsung couldn’t leave the camera interface untouched. There’s a large Mode button right next to the shutter release and video capture buttons, which brings up a carousel of options such as Continuous Shot, Beauty Face, Best Face, Rich Tone (HDR), Panorama, Sports and Night. Beauty Face is automatically activated when you switch to the front camera, though we didn’t find it made much of a difference. The rest of the modes all have their uses. Swiping up from the bottom brings up a row of filters that let you add effects to photos. Finally, another flyout of options on top lets you control the flash, timer, storage location, voice commands and social sharing options.

Samsung_Galaxy_Grand2_camera_ndtv.jpg
We were very pleased with the camera’s performance in daylight. The 8-megapixel images we were able to take were richly detailed. Compression noise was visible when zooming in, but not otherwise, even on a big computer monitor. HDR mode produces similarly impressive results. Even the front camera took some impressive shots.

Video is captured at 720p, and is equally impressive. Our test clips came out clean and smooth, with adequate detail even at a distance. However, results for both still and video were only just about passable in low light. That’s not too much of a surprise, and we’re still happy with the camera’s performance overall.

Samsung_Galaxt_Grand2_daylight_ndtv.jpg
(Click to see full size)

Performance and battery life
We were pleased with the Galaxy Grand 2’s performance in our benchmark tests. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 400 is a mid-range workhorse and we’re glad to see it put to use here. There’s a good balance of CPU and GPU performance, and we were able to achieve 11 frames per second in our GFXbench gaming simulation as well as scores of 5486 and 2798 in 3DMark’s Ice Storm and Ice Storm Extreme scenarios respectively. CPU-bound tests were also strong, beating competition based on Mediatek processors which are priced at the same level or a bit lower. We recorded scores of 2662 in Browsermark, 8427 in Quadrant, and 17,030 in AnTuTu. SunSpider completed its run in 1063 milliseconds, which is impressive.

Audio and video playback was also satisfactory. The phone’s built-in loudspeaker is loud enough, but very tinny. Its placement on the back also makes music sound awful if your phone is lying on a table. The bundled headset is much better, but you’d still prefer your own earphones for any serious listening. Viewing angles are good, with visibility reducing only at extreme angles. We were surprised at how poorly 1080p videos played: there was stuttering and artefacting in all our test samples. 720p on the other hand played without a hitch (in a third-party app). We also found that the Galaxy Grand 2 got quite hot in our hands while trying to play HD video.

The battery lasted 342 minutes in our SD video loop test. This is just about average, and we would really have liked to see more from Samsung in this department.

Samsung_galaxy_grand2_hand_ndtv.jpg
Verdict
It’s no surprise that competition in the Rs. 17,000 to 22,000 range is hot right now. Features that were once exclusive to phones twice that price are tempting users, and multinational brands now find themselves competing with increasingly well-made phones from local manufacturers.

Still, most phones in this price range tend to advertise a single trick such as a full-HD screen or new processor, while neglecting to mention that these things aren’t very useful in isolation. In contrast, Samsung has delivered a well-rounded product that seems to strike a very sensible balance between price, features and performance. Large screens on phones at this price point are no longer crippled by low resolutions, and “quad-core processors” actually have enough meat on their bones to deliver superior performance.

Samsung_galaxy_grand2_package_ndtv.jpg
It isn’t difficult to give this phone a strong recommendation. Sure, it doesn’t stand out in any particular way, but it’s got that balance going in its favour. Owners of the previous Galaxy Grand shouldn’t feel any pressure to upgrade, but anyone who wants a new big-screened phone today should give the Grand 2 a serious consideration.

Interestingly, Samsung’s own Galaxy S4 mini is only slightly more expensive and has similar features in a smaller overall package. If that feels more comfortable in your hand, it’s the logical step up.