Anti-Google Glass attack in San Francisco highlights tension over wearables

San Francisco social media consultant Sarah Slocum says she was attacked this weekend for using Google Glass in a local bar. On her Facebook profile, Slocum said she was “verbally and physically assaulted” by bar patrons who jeered at her for using Glass and, she alleges, snatched the device off of her face. Slocum also said that she was robbed after leaving her purse in the bar as she pursued her alleged attackers.

She has posted a video of part of the incident to YouTube, though it doesn’t show the all the details of the alleged attack:
>

Another video, shared with San Francisco television station KRON4, shows one of the alleged attackers telling Slocum that people like her are “destroying” the city of San Francisco — a comment that ties this incident into a growing backlash against tech companies such as Google, Twitter and others in the city.

San Francisco Police Department Officer Albie Esparza confirmed that a woman reported being involved in an altercation over Google Glass after they believed she was recording them without their consent in a bar Saturday at 1:45 a.m. He said that no suspects are in custody.

Wearable technology is moving people into a brave new world with new rules about how to use evermore ubiquitous gadgets. The path to acceptance, however, is not a smooth one. Google’s head-mounted Glass computer, for example, faces a long road ahead to convince the general public that smart glasses will eventually be as accepted as camera-phones and earbuds. The device has many of the same functions as a smartphone, but lets users read e-mail, see notifications, get directions and take calls via a screen on their faces rather than on their smartphones.

The San Francisco incident follows a handful high-profile reports of negative, sometimes violent reactions that Google Glass users have reported as the new technology causes rifts with restaurant owners, law enforcement officials and movie theater owners.

From a legal standpoint, those fights have largely come out in Google’s favor. A San Diego court dismissed a case against a woman pulled over for using Glass last month. But more cases could be on their way, as a handful of states have also discussed legislation to ban Glass behind the wheel amid worries that having a small screen hovering in users’ peripheral vision will pose a danger on the roads.

Education has been the main tool in Google’s arsenal as it faces questions about the implications Glass has for privacy, distracted driving, piracy and a general unease among some folks who see a person walking around with a head-mounted computer.

The firm, which has already taken the tech for demonstrations on Capitol Hill, has also been touring the country and showing Glass to mayors, state legislators and the general public in order to let people know more about the benefits it sees in the technology.

Google has also placed considerable weight on its beta testers — which it calls Explorers — to act as ambassadors for the technology. Last week, Google released a list of dos and don’ts for Explorers to give them basic etiquette and safety tips on using the device and to remind them to be respectful when facing Glass doubters.

“New technology raises new concerns which is why educating Explorers and those around them is a top priority for the Glass team,” Google said in a statement. “The point of the Explorer program is to get Glass in the hands of people from all walks of life and see how they use it out in the world. Our Explorers provide us with continuous feedback and on the whole, they act as positive ambassadors for Glass on a daily basis. While Glass is currently in the hands of this small group, we find that when people try it for themselves they realize Glass connects people more with the world around them than distracts them from it.”

Joseph White, a Rockville-based consultant and Explorer, said that he’s only faced one negative reaction to his use of Glass since he started using it in December — and it was not nearly as confrontational as Slocum’s alleged encounter.

“The closest experience that I have had to [Slocum’s] is someone coming up to me at an Organizing for America event . . . and asking me ‘What are you recording right now?’ ” he said. White, who is in his 60s, said that while he’s had some conversations with people about the privacy implications of Glass, those same people have also asked to try on the device and have their picture taken with him.

“I have never been asked to take them off,” he said. “And I have been in restaurants, some bars — just out in public at different functions.”

2014 Top 14 Games for PC, PS4 and Xbox One (Full HD 1080P)

Best of PC, PS4, and Xbox One Games 2014

Platz 14 – 00:00 – Dying Light
Platz 13 – 02:13 – Dragon Age Inquisition
Platz 12 – 03:54 – Mirror`s Edge 2
Platz 11 – 05:07 – Star Citizen
Platz 10 – 09:20 – Cyberpunk
Platz 09 – 11:05 – The Evil Within
Platz 08 – 12:30 – Mafia 3
Platz 07 – 12:58 – The Crew
Platz 06 – 13:55 – Doom 4
Platz 05 – 14:44 – Thief
Platz 04 – 15:51 – Dark Souls 2
Platz 03 – 17:48 – Titanfall
Platz 02 – 20:00 – Star Wars Battlefront
Platz 01 – 20:33 – The Elder Scrolls Online

PS4 – The Division Snowdrop Next Gen Engine Trailer (2014)

New next gen trailer for Tom Clancy’s The Division !
Subscribe Now : http://bit.ly/1aeBFwA.
From VGX 2013.

PS4 – The Division Snowdrop Next Gen Engine Trailer (2014). For PlayStation 4 ! Subscribe now to get the best PlayStation 3 (PS3), PlayStation 4 (PS4) and Playstation Games trailers, gameplay teasers, videogame walkthrough and ingame videos ! The Division Next Gen Trailer.

Nanomotors Could Churn Inside of Cancer Cells to Mush

Researchers at Penn State University have placed nanoparticles inside living human cells and been able to direct the movement of the particles through the use of both ultrasonic waves and magnetic forces. While similar demonstrations have been conducted in a test tube (in vitro), this marks the first time that this kind of work has succeeded inside a live human cell.

Once the nanoparticle motors start moving about inside them, the researchers observed that the cells begin to react in ways not previously observed.

“As these nanomotors move around and bump into structures inside the cells, the live cells show internal mechanical responses that no one has seen before,” Tom Mallouk, a professor of materials chemistry and physics at Penn State, said in a press release.

(A video showing how the nanomotors move around inside the cells is below.)

While the over-exuberant press release likened the work to the 1960s sci-fi movie “Fantastic Vogage”, it does not involve anything remotely close to plot details of that movie. (It’s time to put aside this misleading comparison once and for all.) However, this research does invite comparisons to a proposal out of Stanford University back in 2012 in which small antennas on a microchip could receive magnetic fields that propel the chip through the blood stream.

The new nanomotor research, which was published in the 10 February international edition of the journal Angewandte Chemie, used HeLa cells, a type of human cervical cancer cells. The HeLa cells ingest the nanoparticles. Once a high level of ultrasonic waves is focused on the nanoparticles, they begin to move about. If the level is too low, the nanoparticle will not react to the ultrasonic waves.

If a cancer cell were to ingest these nanoparticles, they could be moved around fast enough so that they acted as a sort of high-tech food processor, making a homogenized mix of the cell’s contents.

But Mallouk also sees a more refined role for them. “We might be able to use nanomotors to treat cancer and other diseases by mechanically manipulating cells from the inside,” said Mallouk in the release. “Nanomotors could perform intracellular surgery and deliver drugs noninvasively to living tissues.”

It is through the combination of the ultrasonic waves and the magnetic forces that the researchers have been able to make the nanoparticles move autonomously from each other. The ultrasonic waves manage to move the nanoparticles forward or spin them around. But the magnetic forces are used to actually steer them.

“Autonomous motion might help nanomotors selectively destroy the cells that engulf them,” Mallouk said. “If you want these motors to seek out and destroy cancer cells, for example, it’s better to have them move independently. You don’t want a whole mass of them going in one direction.”

Myo Armband Provides Effortless Gesture Control of Robots, Anything Else

At ICRA last year, JPL presented a robotic control system called the BioSleeve, which is a sensor-packed bandage that wraps around your arm and lets you control robots with movements and gestures. It’s essentially a gesture recognition system that works independently of any external sensors (like cameras or motion capture systems), meaning that you can use it in a variety of positions and in just about any location that you happen to be, like outside, or in space.

The problem with hardware like this is we all know that it’s going to be a long long long long looong time before something that works in a lab at JPL finds its way onto our arms as consumers. But you know what? That’s perfectly fine, because a Canadian startup called Thalmic Labs has its own wearable gesture sensing peripheral that’s about to hit the consumer market, and we got to check it out last month at CES.

The Myo is built around eight EMG (electromyography) muscle activity sensors along with a nine-axis inertial measurement unit (that’s three axes each for accelerometer, gyro, and magnetometer), meaning that you get forearm gesture sensing along with relative motion sensing (as opposed to absolute position). The EMG sensors pick up on the electrical potential generated by muscle cells, and with the Myo on your forearm, the sensors can read all of the muscles that control your fingers, letting them spy on finger position as well as grip strength.

Also somehow stuffed into the Myo armband (the final consumer version will be about half as thick as the developer version in the video) is a rechargeable lithium battery (good for “multi-day usage”), an ARM processor, Bluetooth 4.0 LE, a micro USB port for charging, and wireless compatibility with PCs, Macs, iOS, and Android. Open source APIs enable even more versatility.

For most users, getting the Myo to work will be as simple as slipping it on your arm and making gestures, a set of which will be preprogrammed into the device. To keep you from accidentally gesturing yourself into oblivion, there’s a unique on/off gesture to enable or disable the armband. You’ll be able to map gestures to commands on your computer just like a keyboard: in a video game context, for example, instead of using your mouse button to fire a gun, you can use your trigger finger. Or instead of hitting “R” to reload, you can raise your arm and make a physical gun reloading motion. For extra degrees of freedom, wear a second Myo on your other arm, too.

As for robotics, the big advantage of systems like Myo (or JPL’s BioSleeve) is that it doesn’t require external infrastructure or a controller that you have to hold onto, keep track of, and otherwise be careful with. With a wearable control system, you can keep it on all the time, and instantly activate it with a gesture. It’s simple and intuitive and can be operated with a minimal amount of training, but at the same time, is versatile enough to control a wide variety of robots. But there’s a trade-off: Neither the Myo or the BioSleeve might offer the extra-fine level of control that you can get with something more traditional (like a PS3 controller). As robotic autonomy increases, though, reliance on high-level commands will become the norm, and that’s what things like the Myo are likely best at.

Thalmic is planning to ship consumer Myo units by the middle of this year, and you can pre-order them for $150.